Campaign for Obama, get college credit

Published on August 31, 2012 by

A public university in Colorado may have violated state law by offering students course credit if they volunteered with President Obama’s re-election campaign. A blog post on the Adams State University website billed the opportunity as a “12 week long organizing internship for the Obama Campaign.”

Both the blog post and the course are now gone. The course was canceled due to lack of interest, according to the university. The blog post was taken down earlier this week after a conservative student blog, Campus Reform, reported on it.

The course may have been in violation of the Colorado Fair Campaign Practices Act, which prohibits the use of public resources toward “campaigns involving the nomination, retention, or election of any person to any public office.” Oliver Darcy, the editor at Campus Reform who first reported the story, said the course struck him as a likely violation of state law.

“They are definitely using a few professors at least to help these students with the campaign process, so I don’t understand how it doesn’t use public resources for campaign purposes,” he said in an interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation.

A spokesperson for the university said the blog post was mistaken about the nature of the course, and that students would have been allowed to volunteer with any campaign.

“This is an independent study course that would be available to any student in any campaign,” said Julie Waechter, a spokesperson for ASU, in an interview with TheDC News Foundation.

Waechter declined to give the name of the employee who authorized the course. Dodie Day, the administrator who posted the blog entry, declined to comment.

According to Waechter, the Obama administration reached out to the university about hosting such an offer.

“The Obama campaign did approach the school. Others campaigns did not,” she said, adding that the school would have considered a similar offer from the Republican campaign of Gov. Mitt Romney.

But Peter Wood, president of the National Association of Scholars and a chronicler of political bias in academia, said universities have no business awarding class credit for political activity at all.

“The principle here is that this sort of stuff does not belong in the classroom, and that also it is not something for which students should be receiving academic credit,” said Wood in an interview with TheDC News Foundation. “The public funding that goes into a university is not there to advance political campaigns.”

Earlier this week, Wood reported on a similar instance of liberal political activity entering the classroom at Ohio State University. Professor Brian McHale wrote an e-mail to colleagues asking them to set aside class time for campaign organizers to pitch students on getting involved with the Obama campaign.

“I’ve been in touch with a couple of campus organizers for the Obama campaign, who have asked me to pass along to all of you a request for access to your classes in the next few weeks,” wrote McHale in the e-mail.

For Wood, incidents like the ones at ASU and OSU fit an extensive pattern of improper cooperation between the Obama campaign and university officials.

“It’s one of those things I add to the documentation of fairly numerous instances in which the Obama campaign has crossed the line,” he said.

Stephanie Freer, a recent graduate of Northern Arizona University and conservative activist in Colorado, was disturbed that ASU would advertise a class that promoted a liberal political agenda.

“This public school is funneling students into working for the Obama campaign,” she said in an interview with TheDC News Foundation. “It isn’t right for a public university to be promoting that type of campaign work for course credit.”


 

ETHICS LESSON: Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Under Investigation, To Keynote Democratic Unity Dinner

The Denver Democratic Party has scored one of the most prominent members of the U.S. Congress, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), for its House District 7 “unity” dinner this Saturday.  Unfortunately, she’s better known for her ethical missteps and verbal diarrhea than Congressional leadership.  

In fact, earlier this month, U.S. House leadership announced that the ethical investigation against Rep. Waters would resume after a year-long hiatus caused by Waters’ stalling tactics.  According to The New York Times, ethics investigators are accusing her of “improperly trying to facilitate federal bailout financing and do special favors for a Boston-based bank, OneUnited, at a time when her husband had stock in the company worth about $200,000.”  

Following Waters’ accusations that the House Ethics Committee had violated rules in its inquiry, the committee brought in outside counsel, Billy Martin, a former Justice Department prosecutor, to handle the inquiry.  

The Denver Post’s Vince Carroll noted this morning that Waters is an odd choice – we agree.  Not only is Waters an odd choice period with her ethical foibles, but she’s an odd choice for a Colorado political party with this state’s focus on oil and gas development. In case you’ve forgotten, four years ago, she goofed and admitted that her goal was to socialize the oil and gas industry.  

So, she’s not coming to talk about ethics…she’s not coming to talk about her support of job creation in the natural resources sector…what could she be here to discuss?  

According to Denver Post doyenne Lynn Bartels, Waters is here to talk about the so-called GOP “attack on women” while she campaigns for President Obama here.  

Just because conservatives call Rep. Waters out for her outrageous statements, ridiculous behavior, and unethical dealmaking – and she happens to be a woman – doesn’t mean they’re waging a war on women. As state Rep. Angela Williams (D-Denver) noted, “we believe actions speak louder than words” and her actions are just plain crazy.

 

EAT MY FREE MARKET DUST: Americans Still Prefer Economic Freedom Over Economic Occupation/Bondage

The Occupy squatter movement has been trying hard to turn the word capitalism into a curse word. A new poll released by the Pew Research Center last week demonstrates their failure in that effort, with Americans still preferring economic freedom over a market controlled by government bureaucrats.

From The Hill write up on the poll:

The Pew Research Center found that half of U.S. adults reacted favorably to capitalism, while 4 in 10 responded negatively.  

Meanwhile, 6 out of 10 adults disapproved of socialism, while 31 percent endorsed it.  

All those responses, Pew said, are largely unchanged from April 2010, the last time the group checked on those words.

In a not-surprising-at-all crosstab, Pew found that nearly half of 18-29 year olds had a positive view of socialism. The poll found that as respondents got older, and thus had to spend more time in the real world without their parents' credit card, they became increasingly opposed to socialism and more favorable towards a free market. 

That views towards capitalism haven't soured during the worst economic depression in generations speaks volumes about the enduring ideal of a free market economy in the American ethos. As much as the Occupiers demand their right to take dumps in public parks, in a protest of the economy that pays for their feces to be disposed of after riot police clear them out, they are not succeeding in getting Americans to adopt their warped view of the world. 

Fear not, conservatives. The Pew poll lets us rest easy, knowing that the best cure for leftist economic ideals is simply a cold, hard dose of self-reliance. 

Socialism, it appears from the Pew poll, is only popular when it's someone else's money. But as Margaret Thatcher once said "the problem with socialism is you eventually run out of someone else's money."

Chew on that, socialists. You suck. We rock. 


 
© 2011-2013 Colorado Peak Politics