I believe Doug Thompson is (or will be) running his campaign.Is that the same Doug Thompson who works with Janet Roland and Jennifer Bailey,the same one who was Scott Tipton’s manager, and rumor has it that he will also be campaign manager for Ray Scott? Didn’t he also have something to do with Matt Smith? Gee is there pattern here?

If Mr. Wright really wants to be humbled, maybe the GOP should change the way people are elected. Do away with the caucus’ that are run and packed by party hacks and go to a direct primary that would really give people a choice. Problem with that? You bet, the people might not agree with the party and do something stupid like picking Dan Maes.  

I will. Sorry

Please, PLEASE use the “Reply” hyperlink when you are writing a comment that is meant to be a response to another comment.

Hmmm. I wonder if I posted open threads, what would happen?

How liberal of you to follow the rules so closely….

So, now we have you as calling others you disagree with “trolls” and “idiots”.

Have any more you would like to throw out to show how intellectually honest you are?

I have no control over what gets deleted. Sorry, check your facts. I’m just a reader and commenter who can’t stand trolls who ruin comment sections.

I do, however, support Peak Politics deleting of unrelated troll comments.

Does everybody with a differing viewpoint qualify to be a troll?

Or is it just those who can PROVE their points with FACTS and DATA that exposes the corruption in the political system that you label as ‘trolls’?

Your removal of the comment was nothing less than ill-advised censorship of an opposing viewpoint under the weakest possible excuses.

Good to know though that anybody you disagree with is obviously a druggie and pot smoker.

Alinskys Rule for Radicals,”RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)”

How does that label work for you?  Pretty accurate of your actions?

You were using an article you knew people would be reading to spout your own troll bullshit.

If you think because your comment relates to Colorado politics that makes it relevant, you must be smoking something strong.

If you want to go on a rant completely unrelated to a post, go to a Ron Paul forum and join your fellow tin foil hatted brethren there.  

What was being exposed in my comment was how the GOP co-opts potential and incumbent candidates and what their attitude is regarding the voter’s right to know.  And it was directly related to the subject matter in the author’s article, at least within the parameters that he chose to describe his topic and his selection of tag lines.  

But I do understand why you censored my comment and I think most other readers now do, also.  It is what it is.