Comments on: MORSE TO CLINTON: You Don’t Know Jack About Guns

By: Colorado Peak Politics - LESSONS LEARNED: 7 Takeaways From The Total Recall

Colorado Peak Politics - LESSONS LEARNED: 7 Takeaways From The Total Recall — Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:59:31 +0000

[…] Democrats listened to Clinton’s advice on guns in the first place, they probably would never have ended up in the […]

By: Laura Fronckiewicz

Laura Fronckiewicz — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 04:35:02 +0000

proud to be one!

By: Colorado Peak Politics - BLOOMBERG WINS, RURAL COLORADO HOLDING THE BAG: Gov Hickenlooper Promises To Sign Gun Magazine Ban

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:09:52 +0000

[…] month Bill Clinton famously predicted that Democrats would lose their jobs if they got sucked into the gun control mud. Hickenlooper […]

By: Nicholas Demos

Nicholas Demos — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:27:45 +0000

While I like this idea (recalling Morse), there are two things. One, I hear it's expensive and difficult to petition a recall. Two, even if Morse was ousted, what exactly does that buy us? If replaced by a pro-2A Dem or Rep, the Senate would still have a majority of anti-2A Dems and another (likely anti-2A Dem) would take over his position as President of the Senate. A recall will not stop this legislation from getting through, given the time constraints.

I'm not trying to be a naysayer, just trying to define goals that achieve something.

By: Gary Shook

Gary Shook — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:03:03 +0000

Shawn, you're clueless- he's term limited, not up for re-election in 2014- back in 2010 election, his margin was LESS than 1%, with a 3rd party candidate taking 4.5% of the vote. The ONLY reason he won at all was because re-districting by Democrats gave his district specific neighborhoods in Colorado Springs… it would take less than 3,400 signatures to initiate a recall election- which he would NOT win.

By: Gary Shook

Gary Shook — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:58:34 +0000

less than 3,400 signatures on a petition to the CO Secretary of State could initiate a recall election. He won in 2010 by less than 1%, he would NOT survive a recall election.

By: Scott Montgomery

Scott Montgomery — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:02:45 +0000

91%? What kool-aid channel are you watching? CNN, MSNBC…

By: Shawn Rosvold

Shawn Rosvold — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:26:01 +0000

Mythical? Hardly. 91% of Americans want stricter gun laws. The number of people at a meeting is hardly a scientific measure of anything but attendance at a meeting.

By: Christine Sullivan Marosvary

Christine Sullivan Marosvary — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:00:55 +0000

Now there are thousands of brand new single issue voters FOR gun reform

By: Lou Barraza

Lou Barraza — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:20:34 +0000

S. 397 (109th): Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act was signed into law in 2005 by President Bush.
A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others.