Washington, DC insiders have long despised anyone unwilling to play their games. They especially hate anyone who is able to rise to political stardom without their blessing. With Michele Bachmann skyrocketing from single digits to a statistical dead heat with Mitt Romney in the obsessively watched Des Moines Register poll released on Saturday, the backbiting has begun.Democrats and anonymous Republicans attack Bachmann in a Politico article today, complaining she has not had her name etched into legislation during her time in the House, forgetting that until this year she has been in the minority party, where virtually no one gets their legislation passed.
It's no surprise that anonymous Republicans are quoted in the article. Bachmann's popularity rubs many of them the wrong way, as they think they should be the ones with adoring fans and endless requests for media interviews. Says one (jealous) Republican:
“There’s not been one single legislative accomplishment she’s had,” said a GOP lawmaker who serves with Bachmann on the Financial Services Committee. “She shows up, but is that the foundation of her campaign opposition? She’s not bringing any achievements, she hasn’t proactively legislated or proactively blocked any bills.”
Sachtleben added: “Perhaps her most important achievement in terms of votes cast was her unwavering consistency in voting against TARP, stimulus, cap and trade, Obamacare and the rest of the big-spending, job-destroying, deficit-busting bills that were put forth by the Democrat majority.”
To primary voters, her standing on the right side of important issues will matter a heck of a lot more than her ability to name post offices or back slap her way past Nancy Pelosi to pass some watered down version of good legislation — if not outright bad legislation that is often the product of DC's deal making culture.
“I have never regarded her as very thoughtful,” Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said in an interview. Frank chaired the House Financial Services Committee from 2006 to 2010. “Frankly, as a member of the committee, she did not seem to be a major factor, even with the Republicans.”
I would be dishing up AS MUCH “BAD PRESS” as I possibly could about this idiot if I were Obama (policy wise he may be an dumbass, but politically sharp as a tack). Build her up (by tearing her down) so that all the campaign has to say against her (when it actually matters) is:
“Michele Bachmann is a Nobel prize winning proven lying bullshit artist, non-fact checking, extremist, with significant ties to white supremacy groups, serial killers, and the “evil” non-regulatory corporate republican party who lied their way INTO our economic disaster. And by the way, she has no executive experience, is more extreme than Sarah Palin, is gonna throw grandma out on the street, all while returning our county to a Christian theocracy.
I would serve that on a platter if I was Obama. Have fun with the whole “anti-establishment” thing until THAT is the narrative. The average non-political voter may think Obama sucks, but who in their RIGHT MIND would give her the keys to power??
but she and Obama aren’t that much different from one another. Neither had many, if any, legislative accomplishments–but both give great speeches about what they’d hypothetically do if elected..they both know how to rile up the base, but are they the best choice?