Colorado Peak Politics
  • Featured Posts
  • The Soapbox
  • Archives

PANTS ON FIRE: Liberals’ Big Lie on Disaster Relief Funding

Posted on September 23, 2013 by colo0566

UPDATE: Democrats wanted to be sure that our readers knew that the Democrats in the Colorado delegation voted for the pork-filled Frelinghuysen amendment that wouldn’t have helped Sandy victims for years, so as a favor to them, we’re correcting our error which gave their legislative judgment too much credit.  You’re welcome.

When ColoradoPols penned an open letter to America about the devastation caused by the unusual flooding in Colorado, the letter started out…ok.  And, then Pols took the opportunity to politicize this terrible tragedy by pointing out that Republicans voted against aid for victims of Hurricane Sandy.  First, way to politicize a tragedy, you asshats.  Rahm “Never Let a Tragedy Go to Waste” Emmanuel would be so proud.  Second, it just ain’t true.

Let’s set the record straight.  There were two pieces of legislation that made their way through Congress in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy – one that provided immediate aid to those who lost so much during this storm (the Rogers amendment) and another that was filled with pork spending that promised aid several years later (the Frelinghuysen amendment).

Here’s what the Rogers amendment offered: $17 billion in immediate assistance to victims of Hurricane Sandy by providing funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster relief fund, housing for those whose homes were destroyed, and funding for damaged infrastructure and transit systems.  Rep. Gardner and the Republican Colorado delegation voted in favor of this amendment.  To say that Republicans voted down immediate aid is a flat out lie.

Here’s what the Frelinghuysen amendment offered: an extra $33 billion, 80 percent of which would not be spent until after 2015, and much of which did not directly help Sandy victims. Here are some examples of the pork that was contained in the this amendment, according to the New York Post:

“The pork-barrel feast includes more than $8 million to buy cars and equipment for the Homeland Security and Justice departments. It also includes a whopping $150 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to dole out to fisheries in Alaska and $2 million for the Smithsonian Institution to repair museum roofs in DC.”

Yes, the funds were to be used even for a fishery in Alaska.  We hope we don’t need to remind you, PeakNation™, that Alaska was not impacted by Hurricane Sandy.  Gardner and the Colorado delegation rightly voted against that amendment.

But, Congressman Gardner went even further to bring aid to Colorado in the aftermath of last year’s wildfires.  Gardner offered an amendment that would have added funding for the Emergency Watershed Protection program to all areas that experienced a natural disaster this year.  Following the High Park and Waldo Canyon fires, the funding could have prevented erosion that exacerbated the flooding situation in these areas.  While the Colorado delegation supported the amendment, it was not considered by the entire U.S. House.

On Friday, Gardner took to the floor of the U.S. House to fight to raise the $100 million Federal Highway Administration funding cap on emergency relief, along with Kentucky Republican Hal Rogers, according to the Denver Post.  Here’s what Gardner said:

“The tragedy and devastation caused by this severe flood necessitates a response from the federal government.  I ask the chairman to consider working with me and other members of the Colorado delegation to help our state recover and rebuild from this tragedy.”

This is a measure that all nine of Colorado’s federally elected officials supported as evidenced by the letters they each sent earlier this week.

The bottom line is that Colorado Republicans have voted for and have fought for legislation and funding that would benefit victims of natural disasters in Colorado and across the country.  To say otherwise, is blatantly false and misleading.  So, Pols, if you’re going to start throwing accusations like that around, you should probably get your facts straight first.

181
SHARES
ShareTweet
« DUDE, WHERE’S YOUR PLAN? Coloradans Losing Health Insurance Over Obamacare, Colorado Media Silent
CONGRATS: Mark Baisley Elected Vice Chair of Colo GOP »

11 thoughts on “PANTS ON FIRE: Liberals’ Big Lie on Disaster Relief Funding”

  1. Daniel Roy says:
    September 28, 2013 at 9:28 am

    Natural disaster can't be avoided we can do only only efforts to survive in these kind of circumstances.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6giBBbDSK4

    Log in to Reply
  2. Alan Franklin says:
    September 23, 2013 at 9:34 pm

    I was thinking it would also help if you noted that Rodney Frelinghuysen is a Republican. That is, help tell the truth, which is not really the point of this blog.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Alan Franklin says:
    September 23, 2013 at 6:40 pm

    Thanks for the correction, Peak Pols.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Michelle Dougherty Bennewitz says:
    September 23, 2013 at 5:48 pm

    Alan – had you read the statement above which mentioned the Gardner and the Colorado Republican delegation, you would have known that the second part was directed at the SAME group. Please consider re-reading the FACTS before making a statement that may embarrass you. Happy Monday to you sir.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Andi Chernushin says:
    September 23, 2013 at 5:13 pm

    I am a victim of the flood here in Colorado Springs. I can personally state that the only response I received regarding assistance for my neighbors that were under insured or uninsured was from the GOP. Lamborn's office has been instrumental in their concern and involvement. They had a representative in our neighborhood within 18 hours after our initial phone calls. Gardner's office has also been proactive and responsive.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Rob Dahlager says:
    September 23, 2013 at 4:36 pm

    Alan, you moron, that is exactly what the article says …. None of them voted for the amendment. Do they not teach reading comprehension in progressive schools?

    Log in to Reply
  7. Gerald B Carpenter says:
    September 23, 2013 at 4:36 pm

    obahomo threatens people with this and that…lets see who has the balls and the real brains to stand up and be counted and do as the PEOPLE WISH AND NOT THAT ASS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Cathy Gardino says:
    September 23, 2013 at 4:16 pm

    Having their own version of the truth may be convenient for the progressives while they're in the houses of power… What they're forgetting is the TRUTH has no agenda and stands on its own. The fire of TRUTH burns very clean… Bu-Bye Progressives… Operation CLEAN SWEEP is coming. Ashes, ashes, you all fall down!

    Log in to Reply
  9. Rob Jaramillo says:
    September 23, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    They are liberals they go off emotion, threat, and bribery… There is no facts involved…

    Log in to Reply
  10. Clay Watts says:
    September 23, 2013 at 4:10 pm

    Alan Franklin, I wouldn't believe you if you said the sky was Blue. Stay in your Momma's Basement.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Alan Franklin says:
    September 23, 2013 at 3:57 pm

    "Gardner and the Colorado delegation rightly voted against that [Frelinghuysen] amendment." This statement is false. The Frelinghyusen Amendment pass 228-192, and in Colorado was a party-line vote. 38 Republicans joined with Democrats to pass, none from Colorado.

    Please consider telling the truth about something at some point. Happy Monday!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Latest Posts

  • ON THE BALLOT: Colorado Gubernatorial Primaries Solidify
  • AND THEN THERE WERE THREE: GOP Governor’s Race Tightens as Robinson Fails to Make the Ballot
  • $PRINGTIME IN PARI$: How Hancock Blew Our Bucks
  • WAR ON THE MIDDLE CLASS: Dems Say No to 529 Plans, But Keep That Tax Cut For the CEO’s Model X
  • BARACK OBAMA HIGHWAY: Of All People, Pabon Should Recognize a Scandal

Follow Colorado Peak Politics

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2011-2017 Colorado Peak Politics